On 06.10.23 22:09, Kinsey Moore wrote:
This provides a non-noop implementation of spinlocks for JFFS2 in terms of RTEMS mutexes. POSIX spinlocks are not appropriate for the types of actions that occur during a held JFFS2 spinlock and can cause bad dispatch level conditions.

I think you are about to open a can of worms. So far, we had only one global lock for the complete JFFS2 instance. If you really want to start using the JFFS2 internal locking, then this should done thoroughly and not case by case from one issue to the next. All this delayed write stuff is currently not covered by tests.

--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to