On 23/1/2024 5:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > ----- Am 22. Jan 2024 um 22:56 schrieb Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org: > >> On 22/1/2024 6:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 22.01.24 00:47, Chris Johns wrote: >>>> On 22/1/2024 3:42 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>>> Does XCode ship a Symbolize.h and llvm-config? >>>> >>>> No ... >>>> >>>> % uname -a >>>> Darwin weka.contemporary.net.au 23.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 23.2.0: Wed >>>> Nov 15 >>>> 21:55:06 PST 2023; root:xnu-10002.61.3~2/RELEASE_ARM64_T6020 arm64 >>>> % c++ -v >>>> Apple clang version 15.0.0 (clang-1500.1.0.2.5) >>>> Target: arm64-apple-darwin23.2.0 >>>> Thread model: posix >>>> InstalledDir: >>>> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin >>>> % type llvm-config >>>> llvm-config not found >>>> % find >>>> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain >>>> -name Symbolize.h >>>> % >>> >>> Ok, thanks for checking. It seems that using the LLVM from brew is then the >>> right approach. >> >> I have stated for years now we will not depend on brew or macports for >> building >> RTEMS tools. Those distro packagers are rolling releases. Also what about >> MacPorts? >> >> FYI when I first moved to Macs and I starting building native tools with >> macports then brew and gave up. At the time our tool versions exposed issues >> in >> their tools and updates broke working things and exposed new issues till the >> point I found myself attempting to fix issue is those distros. Xcode tools >> just >> worked and have done so for 20+ years. > > What I meant with right approach is that using the brew provided LLVM for a > Github job is the right approach to test to RTEMS Tools build with LLVM. You > can of course build the RTEMS Tools with XCode only.
Thanks for explaining this. Sorry, I had misunderstood the comment. > >> >>> >>> Can I check in the patch now? >>> >> >> If the changes does not build for me without brew or macports then I am a no. > > The usage of LLVM for the RTEMS Tools is optional. You can build them without > LLVM. However, this patch is relevant to a host which has LLVM installed. So, > to test this patch you need an LLVM installation. Great and thanks. The change is fine to push however I like to understand some things ... Does this mean that tool does not work on some operating systems? Does the user get any indication? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
