> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Januar 2024 11:08 > An: devel <devel@rtems.org> > Cc: Sommer, Jan <jan.som...@dlr.de> > Betreff: Re: Naming convention for Rust target platforms > > Hello Jan, > > On 29.01.24 19:41, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote: > > So, for the Zynq and similar BSPs this would yield for the Rust target > > something like: armv7a-rtems6-eabihf (and possibly armv7a-rtems6-eabi). > > Similarly, for other ARM BSPs additional Rust targets would need to be > > added. Which might add up to quite a number of Rust targets over time. > > Is this fine or do you see another solution? > > how are the GCC machine flags determined (for linking)? Are they derived > from the target name? >
In my current setup I read the information from the pkgconfig files of the BSP. I remember that at some point the pkgconfig was marked as experimental. Is that still the case or is it now an official part of the RTEMS6 release? > -- > embedded brains GmbH & Co. KG > Herr Sebastian HUBER > Dornierstr. 4 > 82178 Puchheim > Germany > email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16 > fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08 > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München > Registernummer: HRB 157899 > Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler > Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: > https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel