On 21/3/2024 2:11 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 19.03.24 18:44, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 20/3/2024 2:03 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 19.03.24 14:50, Kinsey Moore wrote: >>>> The xilinx-zynqmp-rpu bsp_reset() is modified, but not included in the spec >>>> file for the new option. Its family differs from the arm/xilinx-zynqmp BSP >>>> family with a -rpu suffix. >>> Yes, but this BSP is quite new. I would prefer to let it not flush anything >>> by >>> default to carry out a reset. >>> >>>> I'd be fine with this being enabled for the AArch64 BSPs as well, but I >>>> imagine that's better as a separate patch. >>> Why should it be enabled by default? The arm/xilinx-zynq and >>> arm/xilinx-zynqmp >>> BSPs were the only ones doing an UART flush in the general termination >>> procedure. It probably was done to address a specific use case (maybe test >>> runs). >> Is the issue the flush is before an infinite loop which means the UART FIFO >> should drain?
What is the issue you are wanting to solve removing the flush? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
