Maxim Sobolev a écrit : > Emmanuel BUU wrote: > >> Maxim Sobolev a écrit : >> >>> Emmanuel BUU wrote: >>> >>>> Hum great, maybe I can help with the NATHELPER module of OpenSIPS if you >>>> describe me what change have been made to the RTP proxy control protocol >>>> and provide me access to the source code. >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, it should be possible. I will see what I can do in the next few days. >>> > > Emmanuel, > > The change is in CVS now, you are expected to provide either binding > address for media or expected remote media address for automatic local > address determination: > > > > > > Internally feature is implemented as an extension to the U/L command. > > option "l" should be used for local addresses, or option "r" for > remote, > > with IPv6 address enclosed into square brackets. For example: > > > > Ul[abcd:efgh:0:1] callid remote_ip remote_port fromtag > > > > Lr1.2.3.4 callid remote_ip remote_port fromtag totag > > > > Changes to OpenSIPS, Kamalio/SER and Sippy B2BUA are to follow. > > Please let me know if you want to go ahead and make a patch for the > nathelper. It would involve extracting destination address from the RURI > for INVITE, and from upper Via for 200 OK. > Well I have a question: if I extract the dest address from RURI, this may not be a numerical adress. Is the new RTPPROXY able to handle that?
Ex : Lrsip.external.com zegeryerzeyyr remote_ip 19874 fzepitzejnt lsdknglkt > Regards, > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtpproxy.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
