On 2020-01-22 20:23, Heiser, Gernot (Data61, Kensington NSW) wrote:
> 
> Forking is a very bad idea. If you modify the kernel, you’re breaking 
> verification, and it’s no longer seL4. And it will be one job of the 
> Foundation to ensure that only things that *are* seL4 are called seL4.
>

Would you be willing to accept PRs that include the corresponding
changes to the proofs, or which don’t affect verification?

While I support and agree with your statement, I believe this fact
is why so few people are using seL4 as a basis for new OS designs.
If someone bases their operating system on seL4, they are limiting
themselves to the features that can be implemented on top of seL4.
I hope that it will someday be possible to implement any reasonable OS
whatsoever on top of seL4, but I am not certain that is the case yet.
And if someone finds that they need a feature (writing UEFI variables,
64-bit virtualization) that isn’t in seL4, they are stuck.  They
can’t implement the feature on top of seL4, and they can’t fork
seL4 to implement it themselves.  So they are facing a full rewrite.

(UEFI variable support *must* be implemented in the kernel, because
UEFI variables are accessed via privileged CPU instructions, not via
MMIO or x86 I/O ports.  Without it, it is impossible to modify the boot
order on UEFI systems, which I consider to be an important feature.)

Personally, I will consider seL4 to be feature complete when Linux
could be ported to run as a user-mode process on top of seL4 without
losing any features, and while still being scalable to thousands of
CPUs.  The choice of Linux is not important here.  What is important
is that seL4 is flexible enough to build any OS whatsoever on top of
it, so that those building on top of it need not worry that it will
get in their way.

Does seL4 plan to be reach this feature set?  While a “no” answer
is obviously okay, I do think that the seL4 documentation should help
OS writers determine if seL4 is a good base for them.

> Gernot

Demi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to