Sven Luther writes: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 11:58:03AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote: > > Sven Luther writes: > > > Hello, ... > > > > > > I have been trying to build the driver SDK thingy on both 4.3.0 and > > > head, and it seems to be somewhat broken. In particular there are some > > > missing files, which altough needed, are not part of the SDK, like the > > > render includes for example. > > > > > > So, i looked at the whole stuff, and have been trying to fix this, but > > > encountered that many driver missed declaring some of their file, which > > > is a pain. > > > > > > Since the driver SDK is aimed mostly at building drivers, maybe listing > > > all files as being part of the SDK in the Imakefile is not the most > > > appropriate way of doing this, since mostly _all_ the files of the > > > driver directory are really needed, and in fact my aim is to not use the > > > drivers from the sdk, but the ones from the driver module just announced > > > by Alan. > > > > I'm currently exploring a toatlly new SDK which takes advantage of > > driver modules. It doesn't even attempt to add drivers to the SDK, > > but it expects them to be dropped in from a separate tarball. > > Hello, > > I expect to be looking at the SDK stuff again nextly, and would like to > know if you did advance some with this code since you wrote this ?
No, unfortunately not. I've just returned from vacation and didn't have time to look at it any more. The next two weeks are pretty occupied with other things, too. > > Also, would your new SDK still use a fixed path or should it be possible > to install it anywhere ? > Fixed path? I have not looked at the old SDK, but my plan is to have it like the build tree so you should be able to put it anywhere. Egbert. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
