On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 07:50:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > When discussing with Matthew, some other question came out, which need > to be decided before we got further on this. Matthew tried to build the > SDK without xlibs-dev, which i don't even considered doing. As such, he > noticed 43 further headers which i did miss, and are part of the > xlibs-dev header files. Two path can go from there : > > 1) We make the sdk depend on the xlibs-dev. Should be ok if the > distribs distribute the SDK as part of the xfree86 packages. I am > trying to obtain this from the debian packages. > > 2) We move those headers to the SDK and don't depend on the xlibs-dev. > We need to make sure we use the headers from the SDK and never the > usual ones though. >
As nobody responded to this, maybe it did not get noticed in the other mail. Debian is nearing a release of the 4.3.0 packages, which will include a SDK package, so i think it would be nice to solve this problem now, before all distributions implement the SDK in different ways. I hope to have this solved for this WE, when i will try to finish the SDK fix if we have reached a consensus. Friendly, Sven Luther _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
