On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > If you read the notice that accompanied the change you are refering to, > > you will see that this change of yours is unnecessary.
> I'm not sure why you feel it's unnecessary since I never declared my > motivation for the change. I use tools (external to the xfree > project) to process these cpp scripts. > I admit, until recently I only used them on xf4.3 and earlier but this > one script stands out from the others because of the XCOMM not > starting at col 0. I only made the change request because it doesn't > seem consistent with the rest of the scripts in the tree. Yes, but the '#'-signs the XCOMM's eventually turn into are still preceeded by whitespace, just like they were intended to be in the startx script generated prior to this change. Marc. +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Marc Aurele La France | work: 1-780-492-9310 | | Computing and Network Services | fax: 1-780-492-1729 | | 352 General Services Building | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | University of Alberta +-----------------------------------+ | Edmonton, Alberta | | | T6G 2H1 | Standard disclaimers apply | | CANADA | | +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ XFree86 developer and VP. ATI driver and X server internals. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
