> If this is supposed to be a fork, do you have any further plans,
> like a roadmap or a feature list in mind?
No, I was only talking to myself. There are many patches around and
they don't get the bug testing they would need.
> However, the more important point comes after the release. My draft
> for a road map (must be 2+ years old now) is largely ignored, so I
> wonder: Would you prefer the random way NEdit struggled forward (and
> it did!) in the past or do you think another method should be used?
I know about two working "methods":
- many developers, large user bases. Examples would be Linux,
KDE, Gnome, Mozilla, - there are some more I'm sure.
- one devoted proficient developer with the required time to
care for the project. Examples would be Vim, MikTeX, perhaps
a few others.
Now, to which one NEdit belongs to? Or, to say it in a direct way,
even if there would be a roadmap, method, or whatever, what difference
does it make for an average open source project?
The "random way" isn't a preference -- it's a consequence.
Jörg
--
NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected]
http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
