Hi, * Jörg Fischer wrote (2008-01-17 23:27): >Thorsten Haude wrote: >> >http://nedit.gmxhome.de/dotNE-additions.tar.gz >> >> So you suggest to take the complete set instead of the current >> suggestion? > >No, it's called additions, which means the proposal is to add these to >dotNE(dit).
Well, I can't just add it, can I?
Ok, here is my suggestion: I will merge the two on the weekend, so
that the result includes RSI and a few other things. I don't think
everything should go in, as some library functions are unused. Also,
there is redundancy (basename; actually I'm tempted to rewrite it to
return an array instead of offering four different functions.). Last,
I think all macros in this package should have the same style, so I'll
use mine.
Does this sound good?
>The simplistic on demand loading is also merely a suggestion.
I don't think we should use this, NEdit's natural ways of handling
macros should be exposed, not covered.
>> The RSI might be a bit intimidating.
>
>The macro menu is much shorter when I use my menu patch;-)
Not intimidating menu-wise, but a lot of code to read an understand.
>Anyway, IMHO an interface to rangesets belongs into such an package.
You have a point there.
Thorsten
--
Alles ist richtig, auch das Gegenteil.
- Kurt Tucholsky
pgpJNK25WlNEx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
