I've done some more editing of the page. On Saturday 08 March 2008 05:41 pm, Joerg Fischer wrote: > My comments are on the discussion page, now. Specifically, I think > the proposed bookmarks implementation is overkill for such a simple > feature.
I deleted it. (I may bring it up again next year, however. ;-) (I felt comfortable deleting this as it was my suggestion (at least in terms of adding it to the GSoC list).) > In another direction, doing highlighing by really parsing > the syntax of a file versus the current regex based approach seems > a bit heavy IMO, too. I didn't delete this, but there are a lot of comments there now. Should we delete it? > > (Aside: If we get one or more GSoC students, we may have to make special > > arrangements for committing their code--afaict, we have to be able to > > identify their code separate from anything anyone else might do with it. At > > least one project last year had to do something along the lines of writing > > some code (iiuc) to go back and separate out code from their GSoC > > student(s).) > > Aren't they providing their code under GPL (plus nedit's Motif > exception)? Absolutely--a student making a proposal to the NEdit project must provide their code to the NEdit project under the terms of the license which NEdit uses. I wasn't very clear here (and I can't be entirely clear), but I get the impression that at some point the student's code (only, with no other code) had to be put somewhere for whatever reason. If we get selected as a mentoring organization, we'll have to get clarification on exactly what they require. Randy Kramer -- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
