Re: [developer] Re: Using many zpools

[nagy . attila]

On Tuesday, July 02, 2019, at 11:28 PM, Richard Laager wrote:
> Why are you doing 44 single disk zpools? One big downside then is that
you have no redundancy.
I've tried to explain that above.
I have redundancy over multiple hosts. I replicate all objects between the 
machines.
This way doing anything other than multiple zpools are a waste.
If I just throw all disks into a big zpool with striping, I have to rebuild all 
the data if one disk fails.
If I use mirror or raidz, this adds up unnecessary IO needs and disk usage.
------------------------------------------
openzfs: openzfs-developer
Permalink: 
https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T10533b84f9e1cfc5-M232d4fb18cc56e6c11d262ea
Delivery options: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/subscription