On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Leigh Caldwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should we correct this distortion by taxing data analysis? > Probably not :-), but don't tell Gordon. Data itself already gets 'taxed' by charging for access (e.g., full census details). I was thinking about a world where there may be dozens of different analyses purporting to prove different things, and how we will navigate through and make sense of it. M. > > 2009/12/16 Matt Wardman <[email protected]> > > I wonder - will all of this skew influence even more in favour of those >> with data analysis capabilities ? >> >> But I guess the same question applies at every stage. >> >> Just thinking. >> >> Matt >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Tom Steinberg <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Extremely grim, but extremely important data transparency and >>> visualistion: >>> >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8401344.stm >>> >>> I wonder if they'd share the whole dataset? >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list [email protected] >>> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: >>> >>> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list [email protected] >> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: >> >> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public >> > > > > -- > Leigh Caldwell (t) +44 20 7064 6556 (m) +44 7747 062906 > Chief executive, Inon http://www.inon.com/ > Blog: http://www.knowingandmaking.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list [email protected] > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
