Thanks for the stuff but I was confused when I saw it first as it seems to be done ward by ward. Wouldn't it be better to do it council by council like the BBC as most people would understand that rather then ward by ward thing? It took me a few minutes to figure that one out after I saw the information by clicking on one of the links.
Support solar power in the developing world. http://www.everyclick.com/solaraid http://www.solar-aid.org/ ________________________________ From: CountCulture <[email protected]> To: "mySociety public, general purpose discussion list" <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, 12 May, 2010 21:46:50 Subject: Re: [mySociety:public] Local elections We're collating local election results published as part of the Open Election Data project (http://openelectiondata.org - feel free to contact your council and ask them to take part) - will prob have somewhere between 20 & 35 councils in the end. You can see what we've got so far at http://openlylocal.com/polls. Chris ----------- OpenlyLocal :: Making Local Government More Transparent http://openlylocal.com Blog: http://countculture.wordpress.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/CountCulture On 12 May 2010, at 21:34, Abdul Hai <[email protected]> wrote: It seems that in all the excitement that local election results have been overlooked. This is the BBC version of it which includes council by council. It includes losses and gains but no details about the elected councilors though. > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/election2010/council/html/region_99999.stm > > >Support solar power in the developing world. >http://www.everyclick.com/solaraid >http://www.solar-aid.org/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ >Mailing list [email protected] >Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: >https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
