Yes, correctly deleted data is "not held". On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Stephen Booth <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 23 January 2012 08:49, Mark Goodge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > To give a possible real life example: If the information could only be > > retrieved by using data recovery techniques on a disk from which the > > information had previously been deleted then such a request could almost > > certainly be refused on cost grounds even though it would take a data > > recovery firm only a few hours of actual working time to do it. In such a > > case, the fee paid to the data recovery firm is not simply an hourly > rate, > > it's an overall project fee. > > Wouldn't deleted data be excluded under the act? If it's deleted then > it's no longer held by the authority. > > Stephen > > > -- > It's better to ask a silly question than to make a silly assumption. > > http://stephensorablog.blogspot.com/ | > http://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenboothuk | Skype: stephenbooth_uk > > Apparently I'm a "Eierlegende Woll-Milch-Sau", I think it was meant as > a compliment. > > _______________________________________________ > developers-public mailing list > [email protected] > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public > > Unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/colm%40truthmonkey.org >
_______________________________________________ developers-public mailing list [email protected] https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public Unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com
