(Hello. I'm the person who actually submitted the notice in question.) On 7 February 2012 13:05, paul perrin <[email protected]> wrote:
> <quote> > (2) Where that person is a licensing authority, the relevant document must > be given by addressing it to the authority and leaving it at or sending it > by post to— > </quote> > It says 'Leaving it at' - so once 'left' it is no longer your > responsibility what happens to it next... > > If the council are only allowed 10 days notice, and the police require 10 > days from them, then it seems the council have a real problem that *they* > need to sort out. > > From Francis Davey's link: The document was submitted, in fact, on Saturday via the government's Business Link website, which is the council's approved method of electronic submission ( http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/piplink?agency_id=870&service_id=16200010001 ). The act says "The temporary event notice [...] must be given to the relevant licensing authority no later than ten working days before the day on which the event period begins" - the reference is to 'given', not 'received'. I thought section 102.1 of the Act might also be significant: "Where a licensing authority receives a temporary event notice (in duplicate) in accordance with this Part, it must acknowledge receipt of the notice by sending or delivering one notice to the premises user— (a)before the end of the first working day following the day on which it was received, or (b)if the day on which it was received was not a working day, before the end of the second working day following that day." ...which appears to contradict the notion that a notice can only be considered to have been received on a working day. Thanks all for your thoughts. Tim
_______________________________________________ developers-public mailing list [email protected] https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public Unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com
