> On 25 Jun 2015, at 2:42 am, Jan Pokorný <jpoko...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 15/05/15 23:01 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> before proceeding, wanted to ask you, the ML admins and the >> subscribed, if you have any objections again making the two new lists >> from $SUBJ indexed/archived by (subset of) following ML sinks: >> - http://gmane.org/ >> - https://www.mail-archive.com/ >> - https://marc.info/ >> - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ > > Update on this: > > - for both lists a subscription under Gmane and The Mail Archive > (former two sites) was attempted > > - users list seems to be added without a glitch (well, I asked > for gmane.comp.clustering.clusterlabs.users identifier, got > a one without trailing 's', but maybe it's on purpose); > guestimated URLs of this very mail (prone to race conditions): > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.clustering.clusterlabs.user/15 > https://www.mail-archive.com/users@clusterlabs.org/msg00010.html > > - developers list appears not to be added, but this may just be > a question of lazy setup upon first message (could be this one), > in which case the URLs would be (again, "developers" got shortened > to "devel" per Gmane list of lists): > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.clustering.clusterlabs.devel/1 > https://www.mail-archive.com/developers@clusterlabs.org/msg00000.html > > - if for some paranoid reasons you don't want your messages to be > long-time archived by these two services, teach your MUA to add > "X-No-Archive: yes" header when posting an e-mail to the list > > - both services offer import of existing archives, so a reiterated > question for the crowd (and moderators in particualr) now is whether > it would be OK to do so -- the archives themselves are already > publicly available, so it should be just a matter of providing > the respective URLs
sure > > -- > Jan _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers