On 29/01/16 18:31 +0300, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote: > I'm author of the abi-compliance-checker tool, that is used to > create ABI compatibility table at > http://clusterlabs.org/abi/pacemaker/ > > Several months ago I've setup an alternative ABI tracker for the > Pacemaker library here: > http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/pacemaker/ > > The new approach is based on the analysis of objects debug-info > instead of analysis of header files. The source code of a new tool > is available here: https://github.com/lvc/abi-tracker
Great job! It's definitely helpful to have a trustworthy direct lib mapping available for all the cases. As Fedora sbd co-maintainer, I was a bit surprised to see that with pacemaker-1.1.14 introduced, the libpe_status.so versioned dependency was no longer satisfied, asking for sbd rebuild [1]. In the new report format, it's pretty obvious what was going on all the way down [2]. That wasn't true with the old format, at least in this very case. So definitely, thanks for the effort. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CZBGIX4N5RGCMBC27Y4PHHNHIG6COAWL/ (search for sbd) [2] http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/compat_report/pacemaker/1.1.13/1.1.14/68df5/abi_compat_report.html -- Jan (Poki)
pgpZLVVWu23d1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
