On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 06:53:44PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > I don't think that alone would suffice, I'd expect at least (port,transport) > pair to be reasonably unique as long as you can remap TCP/UDP independently > (I am not sure, but would be no surprise) -- but hey, we have just hit > another limitation of the current schema (transport layer not being > taken into account -- is TCP silently assumed, then?).
Yes, TCP-only is another problem. Looking at this again I see that control_port is used for both port forwarding to pacemaker_remote and PCMK_remote_port environment variable. So if I set it to a name like "pcmk" than pacemaker_remote would not know what to do with this. I guess for now I can live with numeric port numbers and this can wait for some schema reorg :) -- Valentin _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
