Looking for some help on this. Thanks, Rohit
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:24 AM Rohit Saini <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > I am trying fence_ilo4 with same ILO device having IPv4 and IPv6 address. > I see some discrepancy in both the behaviours: > > *1. When ILO has IPv4 address* > This is working fine and stonith resources are started immediately. > > *2. When ILO has IPv6 address* > Starting of stonith resources is taking more than 20 seconds sometime. > > *[root@tigana ~]# pcs status* > Cluster name: ucc > Stack: corosync > Current DC: tigana (version 1.1.16-12.el7-94ff4df) - partition with quorum > Last updated: Wed Mar 27 00:01:37 2019 > Last change: Wed Mar 27 00:01:19 2019 by root via cibadmin on orana > > 2 nodes configured > 4 resources configured > > Online: [ orana tigana ] > > Full list of resources: > > Master/Slave Set: unicloud-master [unicloud] > Masters: [ orana ] > Slaves: [ tigana ] > fence-uc-orana (stonith:fence_ilo4): FAILED orana > fence-uc-tigana (stonith:fence_ilo4): Started orana > > Failed Actions: > * fence-uc-orana_start_0 on orana 'unknown error' (1): call=32, > status=Timed Out, exitreason='none', > last-rc-change='Wed Mar 27 00:01:17 2019', queued=0ms, exec=20006ms > *<<<<<<<* > > > > *Queries:* > 1. Why is it happening only for IPv6 ILO devices? Is this some known issue? > 2. Can we increase the timeout period "exec=20006ms" to something else. > > > Thanks, > Rohit > >
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
