On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 09:38, Gerard van Enk wrote:
> > -create a separate interface for images
> > -use "functions"
> > -move the code outside of the builders so that images only use MMBase
> > for storage
> > -use java 1.3 to create dynamic stubs like pierre did a year ago?
> >
> > what are you opinions? (my feeling is that option 3 is the most
> > desirable).
>
> Why would you wanna move code outside of the builders? Isn't the whole
> MMBase idea you can have functionality *inside* the builders?
Because I perfer use MMBase rather than playing around with builders
I use Builder for things like "default" values and such(replacement for
stored procedures?) or things that just belong there like (oalias).
For example I like to program my application so that they only use the
bridge, that also makes it possible to compile/run/debug everything from
an IDE using the RMMCI. And since I am programmer this works very well
for me:). If it's a great application I'm willing to write my own tag
for the taglib. just like the community did.
