[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Also, I noticed that all that is needed in Storage to support transactions > is duplicating existing methods with an additional argument of type > Transaction.This could have been achieved by extending MMJdbc2NodeInterface, I still > don't see justification for a complete redesign.
I could. It would have made the original interface even worse. As I also am part of the Cleaning project, I used the opportunity to make a new interface that could - in time - replace the old ones. That part of coding you could say was part of the Cleaning project (remove all @sql problems). > If you're low on time, we can continue this discussion at a later time. > I agree with Daniel that we need more clarity as to where your project is > going. The transaction project is currently frozen, so it isn't going anywhere right now. It may pick up again once the Query project is done. -- Pierre van Rooden Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815 "All your MMBase are belong to us"
