[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > /attachment.db/<filename>?<nodenumber> > > So, for example, this will download attachement 13014 as a file named > "bestand1.txt" (regardless of the name of the original file): > http://localhost:8080/attachment.db/bestand1.txt?13014
In fact browsers should consider the 'Content-Disposition' header for the file-name, which is also set in the 1.6 servlets. > > Offcourse, the servlet-mapping should have been there all along, the SCAN > attachment editor requires it as well. I'll add it in the 1.5 branch in > CVS next week. > With all the mentioning of 1.6, let's not forget 1.6 is still a long way > from being released. Bugs still need to be fixed in 1.5.x. I don't think this is a bug. Don't forget that the attachment builder is not even 'active' on default, so what use is a mapping to an attachment servlet if you don't have attachments? But yes, it must be documentated clearly that if you want to use it, you need to configure it in web.xml too. I tried that in the url i cited. (See also the 'documentation' module in CVS if you want to add or clarfiy some things yourself) I btw really think 1.6 should be released quickly. We should mark the 'unfinished' things as such, and release the rest. E.g. the editwizards are more or less ready for release now, and I think that taking this opportunity to release 1.6 with the numerous improvements and bugfixes it provides is a good idea. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772979
