Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > Gerard van Enk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Eduard Witteveen wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 16:39, Pierre van Rooden wrote: >>> >>> >>>>[X] +1 (YEA) >>> >>>ps: Should we also adopt j2ee as default package? >> >>I don't think so..... > > > I think he means that we could throw away a lot of the autodownload stuff > from build.xml and replace it by one of the 'j2ee.tgz' or something like > that. > > IIUC then this package contains activation and mail and xalan and so on, in > other words all the stuff we now obtain (to compile against) in build.xml > > So I think it is hardly worth a discussion. If we can simplify our > build-process like this I'd say: do it!
I think it *is* worth discussing. Because if we start using j2ee, does that mean MMBase requires a full j2ee applicationserver? Are we going to make MMBase j2ee compliant? etc. Gerard
