Eduard Witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This makes sense since the dtd's are tightly coupled to code, so they can > > be put in the package hierarchy in a meaningful manner. > > I realize there was opportunity to discuss this preceding the call for > > vote, but I just returned from vacation today and I still would like to > > suggest this as an alternative. > As far as i see it, moving the dtd's to the jar is step one of the > sollution you describe. > I think that the approach you describe an good sollution (altrough i > cant overview how to keep it backwards compatible), but i think we > should keep the changes maintainable.
I think all calls to XMLBasicReader must be changed then. I'm ready to try to make this possible in XMLBasicReader too, but not really feel like changing all calls in the complete source tree.. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772979
