> I've added 2 things to the builder.dtd, a parameter name to the > buildertag and a descriptions/description tag to the field tag. The > first one is needed because there was no buildername inside the > builder.dtd and xslt can't read the filename (which is the buildername). Hi
I think the changes are just great. Adding a name is one thing we realy should have done earlier. But I considder this a big change that should be tested at least with the folowing stuff -reading configuration (making shure name and the file name are equals otherwize print a big error). if the file name and the name attribute are not the same we can't find builders any more. -exporting applications -editing nodemanagers using the jsp /scan admin pages -The xml reading classes now have methods that have 2 arguments the builder name and the configuration. That should also be changed. I just think we can't make such a change 3 day's before the code freeze Or have you been testing this already? An other thing is the work I have been doing the last weeks. I have been creating a set of java interfaces to that define a nodemanager configuration those classes can read and write builder xml configurations. If we are making big changes to the configuration stuff I would like to make a proposal to use the java interfaces as mean to communicate with the cloud. This would finaly make in possible to change the xml location/format without having to change every class using the configurations directely.
