Determining a media package
Called by: Pierre van Rooden
Package name: org.mmbase.applications.media
Total tally on this call : +7
YEA (6) : Rico Jansen, Rob Vermeulen, Daniel Ockeloen, Kees Jongenburger, Rob van Maris, Nico Klasens, Wilbert Hengst
ABSTAIN (0) : Gerard van Enk, Jaco de Groot, Michiel Meeuwissen
NAY (0) :
VETO (0) :
Package name: org.mmbase.ext.media
Total tally on this call : +1
YEA (2) : Gerard van Enk, Michiel Meeuwissen
ABSTAIN (7) : Rico Jansen, Rob Vermeulen, Daniel Ockeloen, Jaco de Groot, Rob van Maris, Nico Klasens, Wilbert Hengst
NAY (1) : Kees Jongenburger
VETO (0) :
Package name: org.mmbasex.media
Total tally on this call : -5
YEA (1) : Michiel Meeuwissen
ABSTAIN (3) :Rob Vermeulen, Daniel Ockeloen, Nico Klasens
NAY (6) : Gerard van Enk, Rico Jansen, Kees Jongenburger, Jaco de Groot, Rob van Maris, Wilbert Hengst
VETO (0) :
Package name: org.mmbase.media
Total tally on this call : +2
YEA (2) : Jaco de Groot, Michiel Meeuwissen
ABSTAIN (8) : Gerard van Enk, Rico Jansen, Rob Vermeulen, Daniel Ockeloen, Kees Jongenburger, Rob van Maris, Nico Klasens, Wilbert Hengst
NAY (0) :
VETO (0) :
No votes, assumed abstained (5): Eduard Witteveen, Marcel Maatkamp, David van Zeventer, Mark Huijser, Johannes Verelst
Call result:
The majority of the committers voted for org.mmbase.applications (+7).
(org.mmbase.media, entered by Michiel Meeuwissen, is second at +2)
Pierre van Rooden wrote:
Call for:
Determining a media package
Description:
We need to determine package to place the data of the media project.
We like to grab the opportunity to decide on a package structure that allows all future extensions to be included in the mmbase package structure without causing confusion with (for isntance) core packages or functionality.
We have the following sugegstions:
- use the existing 'applications' package (wich currently includes xmlimporter, editwizard, and dove):
org.mmbase.applications.media
- a new package for 'extensions' :
org.mmbase.ext.media
- a new main package name, moduled after java / javax:
org.mmbasex.media
Someone pointed out that the last idea might conflict with the convention to use a domain name for the main package name. I don't think that is a big issue, but others migth think differently.
We ask you to give a vote for each package name:
+1 if you like the name, +0 if you are indifferent or don't like it much, -1 if you have practical objections (as opposed to taste), and VETO if you have serious show-stopping issues with it.
START OF CALL: Thursday 06 february 2003, 16:30
END OF CALL: Tuesday 11 february 2003, 16:30
Package name: org.mmbase.applications.media
Package name: org.mmbase.ext.media
Package name: org.mmbasex.media
-- Pierre van Rooden Mediapark, C 107 tel. +31 (0)35 6772815 "Never summon anything bigger than your head."
