Kees Jongenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we need to change the behaviour for singual to > -singular gui name right language > -singular gui name wrong/default language > -nodemanager name /table name > > for plural > -plural gui name right language > -plural gui name wrong/default language > -singular gui name right language > -singular gui name wrong/default language > -nodemanager name /table name > > what do you think the order should be?
I more or less agree, though for plural I would propose: -plural gui name right language -singular gui name right language -plural gui name wrong/default language -singular gui name wrong/default language -nodemanager name /table name Since some languages doen't even now a plural it would be silly to define one for such a language, and falling back to 'singural' would then be most logical. Furthermore, even if your language knows a plural, still, I figure that to you the 'singural' version would be a more comprehensible description of the concept then somthing in another language. In some languages, like e.g. english, the plural is (almost always) a regular derivation of the singural, so it could even be considered: -plural gui name right language -generated plural name right language, if algoritm for language available (think 'image + s') -plural name right language etc. Michiel -- mihxil' Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 []()
