On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:59 am, Eduard Witteveen wrote: > Michiel Meeuwissen wrote: > > Kees Jongenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>windows / xerces also has problems with that. > >> > >>.. I really don't understand how includes are ever supposed to work.. > > > > I really dont' understand why it should not work. It's seems very > > straight-forward... What kind of problems does xerces have? > > Could it be that an xml should have only 1 element in the root? maybe we need to do the same thing as the documentation project "rename the postgresql_lookup.xml to postgresql_lookup.include)
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Kees Jongenburger
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Eduard Witteveen
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Kees Jongenburger
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Kees Jongenburger
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Kees Jongenburger
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Eduard Witteveen
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Kees Jongenburger
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Eduard Witteveen
- RE: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Peter Reitsma
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Kees Jongenburger
- RE: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Peter Reitsma
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Kees Jongenburger
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Eduard Witteveen
- Re: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Kees Jongenburger
- RE: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Rob van Maris
- RE: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Peter Reitsma
- RE: MMBase vs. Postgresql 7.3 Rob van Maris
