ehh.. what are syncNodes exactly? ernst
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Michiel Meeuwissen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 10:49 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: syncnodes > > > Rob Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >I think 'syncnodes' is considered a 'core' builder, which > you cannot not > > >have. Obviously removing them is implemented in > mmobjectbuilder itself > > >because that is easier. > > > > > Even, if it is a core builder, it's better to implement the > > functionality where the responsibility should be. i.e. The > syncnodes > > builder should be responsible for keeping the syncnodes up > to date. > > Implementing it in MMObjectBuilder creates dependencies > that are not > > needed, and e.g. disables you to use a 'MMBase lite' core > that does not > > use syncnodes. > > Well, I think syncnodes is only present as a String in > MMObjectBuilder so it > would really be no problem, and even a trivial change. > > > > It's not a big deal, but it's nice to follow a clean OO design. > > Yes. Though you could argue that syncnodes really belong to > the node they > are syncing, and that the syncnodes-table is like the > oalias-table only a > 'helper', and it's not that obvious where is the most logical place to > implement something. I mean, there are two nodes involved for every > syncnode, the syncnode itself and another node... > > For synchnodes to do everything itself it should subscribe on > change and so > on.. > > I agree it it not a big deal :-) > > Michiel > > > -- > Michiel Meeuwissen | > Mediapark C101 Hilversum | > +31 (0)35 6772979 | I hate Internet Explorer > nl_NL eo_XX en_US | > mihxil' | > [] () | >
