hi,
I noticed that using a field 'no' on hsqldb was translated to 'm_no' in
the database.
However, if I want to specify a constraint on a listnodes I cannot use
'no' but have to use 'm_no' to get it to work. This is using 1.7 but I
remember this was also the case in 1.6.5.
This could be fixed by also translating the constraint fields couldn't it?
I found bug #5228 that reports this and contains a maintainer notice
with a workaround, but shouldn't this be fixed? The problem is
particularly nasty if you develop and deploy on different databases so
you won't notice it at first.
Simon
- Re: constraints on fields that are not premitted in the... Simon Groenewolt
- Re: constraints on fields that are not premitted i... Michiel Meeuwissen
- RE: constraints on fields that are not premitted i... Rob van Maris
- RE: constraints on fields that are not premitted i... Kees Jongenburger
- RE: constraints on fields that are not premitted i... Kees Jongenburger
- Re: constraints on fields that are not premitt... Simon Groenewolt
- Re: constraints on fields that are not pre... Michiel Meeuwissen
