Henk Hangyi wrote: > > Why do you want it? > > I'm using two authentication methods on the one and the same MMBase > application: MMBase for the editors and WindowsNT for the visitors. > > Now i use the serverName to seperate both methods, but this implies i > always have to use two serverNames for this application. It would have > been nice if i could use "MMBase@" to distinguish between the different > parts of the application. But as i understand from Ronald "MMBase@" is > hardcoded, which means i will stick to the serverName solution.
Yes, the idea was that there is only one MMBase per servlet-context (the name of the servlet-context is also somewhere present in the realm), so there would be no need to make the realm configurable. Wouldn't you need some 'ChainedAuthentication' implementation or so? I think you try to make it possible for editors to also see the front-end? So they are using a differnt account then? How btw do you influence the servername? That too is hardcoded with getServerName() IIRC. Just wondering. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Mediacentrum 140 H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
