On 11/15/2010 4:25 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I'm confusing myself trying to think through a view requirement. > > > Start with a typical content type that could have an image (cck)...but > might not. If it does not, then the view should include, with that node > record, node records of content type Image, the selection factor being > that they share a taxonomy vocabulary term, the idea being that the view > row will then have images from a 'pool' along with it from which one can > later be selected to be shown.
Yup, Views doesn't include this relationship. You'd need to write a custom relationship to get this.
