I could be mis-reading the issue at hand, but isn't this remarkably similar to how the Internet Engineering
Task Force does RFC's? If the problem is attempting to manage proper circulation of concepts that core
developers are working on, then it seems appropriate to assign statuses: "Informational",
"historic", "experimental", etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_Comments
If that is the goal, then A) Angie is spot on with the need to call for writers
with free time. B) No, a mailing list is not the proper venue. and C) probably
g.d.o. isn't either.
Sorry to not have a specific solution in mind, but maybe the above methodology,
refined since 1969 - might be a good place to look for a model?
$0.02
Sam Tresler
646-246-8403
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Greg Knaddison wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Earnie Boyd
<[email protected]> wrote:
It would be nice if I could login to my g.d.o account, go to this group
landing page and have an option to follow content to my subscribed email
account. That is similar to what happens with the project issues
queues. I can flag the project issues as interesting to watch so that I
can help if necessary or time permits.
This is prevented by bugs in OG and messaging/notifications.
See http://drupal.org/project/issues/search/?issue_tags=gdolove for
more details.
Greg
--
Greg Knaddison | 720-310-5623 | http://growingventuresolutions.com
Security Services for Drupal sites: http://drupalscout.com
