Nope, I also think it is a bit too much. I think it is around a week in the WebKit project
Kenneth On 02/11/11 11.14, "ext Olivier Goffart" <oliv...@woboq.com> wrote: >On Tuesday 01 November 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt >>project. >> >> Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows >> Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very beginning. >> >> Shane Kearns and Martin Petersson second this proposal. >> >> Please raise any concerns you might have about this until 22nd of >> November 2011 (see the guide lines at >> >>http://wiki.qt-project.org/The_Qt_Governance_Model#How_to_become_an_Appro >>ver >> ). > >I know it is not needed, but I also recommand Richard as an approver. > >But am I alone to think that 3 weeks of waiting time is a lot? >15 work day is a lot, how about reducing it to something between 7 and >10 >work days? > >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >Development@qt-project.org >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development