On Friday, 4 de November de 2011 10:36:29 Peter Hartmann wrote: > I am happy with having one QDnsReply class; I think we can get pretty > far with some special accessors for SRV and other records, and one > generic accessor for simple (QString) and unsupported cases. Then > whoever wants to read a currently unsupported response format needs to > parse the response string himself, which IMO is not that bad. > We can then in the future extend the class with more special accessors > if need be.
There's no way to provide the unsupported formats in QString. It would need to
be QByteArray and, even then, it's useless if it contains a compressed domain
name.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
