Hi, When specifying Visual Studio, could you specify the support for x86, IA64, and AMD64 architectures? I know that supporting a compiler is one thing, but supporting an architecture is another.
Keith -----Original Message----- From: development-bounces+kgardner=zebraimaging....@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+kgardner=zebraimaging....@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Friedemann Kleint Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:46 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Platform / compiler support Hi, > Hi, > > >It'd be nice to have a list of reference platforms and even better if such > >platforms had maintainers who'd provide testing results, help fix issues > >and>generally ensure the platforms are in a working state. Supporting a > >platform may also have implications on the release process. Anyway, all of > >that is a>bigger discussion. I volunteer for Windows/MSVC. Also, I think, we should include/explicitly mention MSVC2010, which is different from MSVC2008 in that it has support for C++11 (read: Using C++11 constructs requires extra checking with this compiler). We could actually require MSVC2010 as minimum version once Qt 5 reaches release status. ATM, we still support MinGW/gcc 4.4 and we are looking into supporting MinGW/gcc 4.6 and 64bit versions of it. But that will probably be limited to qtbase. Regards, Friedemann -- Friedemann Kleint Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
