On Friday, 25 de November de 2011 08.30.56, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > My proposal would be to simplify this setup and start relying on ICU for > many of the tasks. We would still expose things through a Qt API though. > It would simplify the maintenance of our Unicode support, as we can rely > on ICU for most things.
Looks like we're settled on ICU. I can't find the thread on the regular
expression library tests -- has anyone looked at ICU RE? How does it compare
in terms of *performance* with PCRE?
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
