On Saturday, 3 de December de 2011 23.39.57, Francesco Riosa wrote: > reading these two blogs: > http://blog.rburchell.com/2011/12/why-i-avoid-qregexp-in-qt-4-and-so.html > http://blogs.kde.org/node/4510 (Regexp library benchmarks...) > > I've learned of the TRE library (http://laurikari.net/tre/about/) it > has interesting functionality like fuzzy matching and seem to have all > what you need except for named matches (?name: bla bla) > > I've tryed to compile it and it's very small. > > Licensed "As is" > > what does it miss for be elected in qt5 inclusion?
Two things:
1) a fully-compatible syntax to PCRE or JS, with equal or better performance
than existing engines
2) a healthy developer community behind it to ensure that it will continue to
be supported
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
