Robin Burchell said: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Rohan McGovern > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unfortunately the qtwebkit pointed at by qt5.git is outdated and known > > not to work. > > Given that webkit is developed upstream inside webkit.org, I'd second > that there's no reason having it there, aside perhaps from CI, though > AFAIK they have their own infrastructure for this. > > As qtwebkit adds hugely to cloning qt5 (unless you remember to disable > it), as well as the frequent build problems for people new to Qt 5 > etc, is there any real objection to it being removed? Who can make > that decision (I guess Lars?), and who would handle doing that?
Technically, approving and merging this change should do it: http://codereview.qt-project.org/11058 , and also changing the qtwebkit-examples-and-demos repository (which never receives commits anyway?) to use direct submit instead of staging with CI. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
