On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:00:42PM +0100, ext João Abecasis wrote: > It is not appropriate to tag an atomically-replace-previous-version on > to the close() > you don't provide any supporting evidence for that pov, though.
> and normal clean up that the destructor does. > that i agree with. > > No, whatever this class is, close() without commit() means > > "rollback". > > Right. Keep in mind we are not only saving the new version. We're also > destroying a previously known good copy. > uhm, so? without the temp file, open() would already do that. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
