On Sunday, 29 de January de 2012 15.02.01, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote: > I think feedback from KDAB and FrogLogic about this change would also be > valuable, to discuss the changes required to their tools for automated > testing of Qt applications. > > My understanding is that they now would need a code injector on Linux > (like on Windows), instead of simply LD_PRELOADing their libs, right?
Not exactly. In fact, without -Bsymbolic-functions, we don't add the --
dynamic-list option, which is what enables the symbol hijacking they need.
The option is still there, so the hijacking will still work. And I've already
asked Stephen to create a proper callback mechanism, instead of relying on
hijacking (which I proved not to work in my blog).
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
