Yep. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-24154

Kent


Den 08. feb. 2012 13:40, skrev Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo):
> Ok, this one makes sense to finish IMO.
>
> Can you please add a Jira task for it, and make it a subtask for 20885?
>
> Lars
>
> On 2/8/12 1:20 PM, "ext Kent Hansen"<kent.han...@nokia.com>  wrote:
>
>> Den 05. feb. 2012 15:12, skrev ext lars.kn...@nokia.com:
>>> Hi everybody,
>> [...]
>>> Is there anything that I have now forgotten that really *must* be in 5.0
>>> (i.e. it really can't be done in a BC/SC way for Qt 5.1)? If you have
>>> such
>>> an item, please speak up, otherwise I'll consider the above exception
>>> list
>>> as final.
>> I would like to try to finish
>> http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,14763: Changing the meta-object
>> data to represent type information in a more useful/efficient (less
>> string-based) way, and then following up by removing the various
>> codepaths we have for dealing with older meta-object revisions.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kent
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development@qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to