On sexta-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2012 13.20.09, [email protected] wrote: > On 17/02/2012 05:39, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On sexta-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2012 01.47.13, > > > > [email protected] wrote: > >> I'm not saying there won't be any maintenance burden, but it's not > >> massively greater than a lot of other modules either. > > > > I'll take your word for it. > > > > What I'm still looking for is that someone comes out and says "yeah, > > we'll handle that maintenance for the next year or two". > > Modules classified as "done" don't have to be rejected from the release. > We have several modules classified as "done".
QtXml, QtScript and QtSvg have very little in terms of private API they use.
QtDeclarative is quite different.
I'm still looking for someone who will be responsible for that, however
minimal it might sound to you.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
