On terça-feira, 28 de fevereiro de 2012 01.02.25, lata agrawal wrote: > Hi Thiago,
Hello.
Please don't do top-posting to mailing lists.
> Thanks for replying. After reading on net, I found that "even if child
> process finishes and parent process is not waiting for the child process to
> finish, then parent process will not receive a finished signal. rather in
> this case, child process will become a zombie".
That "even" changes the meaning completely of the sentence. If you leave it
out, the sentence makes sense for the generic case.
It does not apply to QProcess though: QProcess is always waiting for the child
process to finish.
> I checked that after using waitforfinished(), I was getting finished
> signal. I will send you minimal compilable code.
> Is there any solution where I can get finished signal from child process
> without waiting for it.
That question does not make sense. QProcess is always waiting for the signal,
which is delivered asynchronously.
Note: you're posting to the mailing list discussion development _of_ Qt. I am
assuming that you have run into a situation that you believe to be due to a Qt
bug. When you send the testcase, I will not be trying to fix it for you -- that
is not the intention of this mailing list.
If you are uncertain whether your code is correct, then we're talking about
development *with* Qt. That's the inter...@qt-project.org mailing list. Please
post there if that's the case.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
