2012/4/12 Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com>: > I think it didn't work well.
While I'm not you, and you didn't really extrapolate on why you think that, I do agree that it certainly wasn't perfect - but the times when it wasn't perfect it was mostly things that either don't apply anymore or can be improved on without fundamental changes to the model - human error (submitting to master when it should not be there, even if pre-approved, I'm guilty here *ahem*) causing breakages - actual api changes (shouldn't be as big an issue anymore) causing breakages/delays in merging back - vast delays in merge due to release (this is a very valid problem, but we should _not_ have been trying to release off master when it is moving so fast, *that* should have been branched off of master, fixes pushed to the release branch, and then have it merged back to master once the release is made - if we avoid trying to release off master again, then we have no reason to not have frequent merges (within reason), and there is no problem here anymore _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development