Samuel:
> It's worth noting that the Qt project is designed to
> be a meritocracy, not a democracy.
What this ignores, though, is the fact that the *CONSUMERS*
of the Qt product are not necessarily at all congruent with
the *DEVELOPERS* of the Qt product. (While there's some
cross-over, I'll bet there's a lot less than many assume.)
Qt "the product" may be developed by a meritocracy of devel-
opers but it damned-well better respond in a more-or-less
democratic way to the needs/demands of the consumers of the
product. If it doesn't, those consumers will move on to
using other frameworks.
Atlant
This e-mail and the information, including any attachments, it contains are
intended to be a confidential communication only to the person or entity to
whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.
Thank you.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
