On quinta-feira, 31 de maio de 2012 13.50.42, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > Unfortunately it took a bit longer than I thought to get binary packages. > So yes, an alpha 2 might not make as much sense anymore as we had hoped > for.
The alpha 2 didn't require binary installers. I think we just dropped the ball
because no one was testing the sources.
> Now that we have the packages, I think our main focus should be to get the
> beta out. From the implementation side I think we're in an ok shape for a
> beta, so it's mostly about making sure the packaging is good and testing
> that we don't have any bigger showstoppers.
I agree, provided we get the split source packages.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
