On quinta-feira, 7 de junho de 2012 06.47.11, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
> >The new optimisation does not introduce "delete value" into the reference-
> >dropping code path. That is still:
> >
> > d->destroy()
> >which does:
> > void destroy() { destroyer(this); }
> > (destroyer is a function pointer)
> >
> >The optimisation simply changes what the pointed function does. Wiithout
> >it,
> >it will call another stored function pointer. With it, it will call
> >delete
> >directly.
>
> You're right. My brain probably stopped working shortly before midnight.
> Will review the remaining patches today as well.
I've just had an idea to make this optimisation slightly more generic. I need
to experiment a little to see if it's worth it. If it is, I'll send a
replacement and let reviewers judge which one is better.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
